Creek vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,584,028 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 5.5 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,546 compared to $53,154, a difference of 49.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $110,398, a difference of 47.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $116,328, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $54,389, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $67,626, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 64.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 59.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.77%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Russian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 34.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 49.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 104.5%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 89.5%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 86.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 65.9%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.8%).