Creek vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,839,516 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 20.0 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 15.6%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $59,383, a difference of 14.3%), and median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $41,758, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,715 compared to $67,965, a difference of 0.37%), median family income ($82,560 compared to $82,064, a difference of 0.61%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $44,003, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 30.2%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 113.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 102.8%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 97.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 25.4%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.64, a difference of 13.6%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (64.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 30.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 29.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.3%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.2%).