Creek vs Paraguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,024,328 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Paraguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 11.9 Paraguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $106,615, a difference of 42.4%), per capita income ($35,546 compared to $50,385, a difference of 41.7%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $95,737, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $55,614, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $64,443, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 61.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 59.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.8%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.12%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.16%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 84.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 32.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 89.4%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 78.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 71.8%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 64.3%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.0%).