Creek vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,621,646 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 94.0 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $118,056, a difference of 57.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $122,222, a difference of 54.8%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $104,796, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.23%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $57,123, a difference of 25.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $69,872, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 79.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 70.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 22.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 50.0%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 40.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.74%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 74.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 120.1%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 112.1%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 98.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.33%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 92.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 75.1%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.0%).