Creek vs American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,425,997 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Americans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.261% in Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 261.0 Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $90,536, a difference of 14.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $84,791, a difference of 13.3%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $75,932, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $55,527, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $35,777, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and American communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and American communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.45%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.21%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and American communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.0%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 21.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.3%).