Creek vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,280,273 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.343. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.127% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 127.4 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,715 compared to $85,818, a difference of 26.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $99,943, a difference of 26.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $94,423, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $59,656, a difference of 14.8%), and median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $54,168, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 36.5%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 33.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.3%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.71%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.4%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.46%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 70.2%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 57.8%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.6%).