Creek vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,912,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.146. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 25.4 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,715 compared to $83,395, a difference of 23.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $96,834, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $91,624, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $51,473, a difference of 10.5%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $57,919, a difference of 11.5%), and per capita income ($35,546 compared to $39,870, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 34.2%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.30%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 104.2%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.4%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.3%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.7%).