Creek vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,679,830 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 14.4 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $129,122, a difference of 72.5%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $116,460, a difference of 72.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $135,508, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $59,424, a difference of 31.0%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $49,256, a difference of 47.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 109.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 95.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 95.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 40.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 26.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 50.0%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.2% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 137.5%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 128.4%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 113.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.13%), 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 115.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 89.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 13.0%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.1%).