Creek vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,857,659 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 6.6 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,546 compared to $49,862, a difference of 40.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $110,103, a difference of 39.4%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $93,960, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.52%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $54,154, a difference of 19.4%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $41,952, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 57.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 53.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 25.3%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 91.4%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 72.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 80.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.9%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.1%).