Creek vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,198,384 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 68.3 Taiwanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $101,492, a difference of 35.6%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $89,900, a difference of 32.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $104,180, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $49,804, a difference of 9.8%), and median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $55,556, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 67.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 62.7%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 29.6%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.42%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.99%), and family households (64.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 60.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.5%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.30%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 71.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.3%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.5%).