Creek vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,553,297 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 16.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,655, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $86,301, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $46,580, a difference of 0.030%), median earnings ($39,648 compared to $40,619, a difference of 2.5%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $84,981, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 55.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 23.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in family households (64.2% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.6%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.3% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 0.18%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 53.5%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 28.0%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 68.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 57.9%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.9%).