Creek vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,322,439 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Africans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 18.3%), median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $36,530, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $84,925, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $47,994, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $46,838, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $53,711, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and African communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and male poverty (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.4%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.83%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (64.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 58.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.1%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 43.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.0%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.3%).