Creek vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,357,856 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 3.2 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $112,484, a difference of 42.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $105,223, a difference of 40.6%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $115,395, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,552, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $65,209, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 62.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 59.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.2%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.3%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 27.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.17%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 73.8%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 68.8%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 67.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 56.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 14.2%).