Creek vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,227,037 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $84,461, a difference of 12.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $88,390, a difference of 11.9%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $91,926, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.23%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $45,764, a difference of 0.87%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $55,677, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Osage communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 23.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 17.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.66%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.88%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Osage communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.2%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.6%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.4%).