Creek vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,098,345 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.265% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 264.5 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $97,284, a difference of 23.2%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $83,289, a difference of 23.0%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $100,256, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,609, a difference of 11.5%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $53,457, a difference of 14.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $59,837, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 36.3%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 32.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.9%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 61.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 49.5%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 47.3%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.18%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 60.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.8%).