Creek vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,327,308 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 15.6 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $111,602, a difference of 41.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $104,578, a difference of 39.7%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $93,971, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $52,540, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $65,326, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 49.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.75%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 34.6%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 68.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 104.9%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 98.2%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 84.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 66.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.8%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.3%).