Creek vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,216,547 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 147.2 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $103,536, a difference of 31.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $97,237, a difference of 29.9%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $106,183, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,379, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $60,967, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 62.4%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 61.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.0%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 27.7%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (64.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 45.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 49.1%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 46.0%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 59.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.6%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.0%).