Creek vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,400,337 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.757. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 39.5 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $71,021, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $105,149, a difference of 33.2%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $89,919, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.7%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $52,306, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $45,027, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 49.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 45.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.11%), currently married (46.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 30.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 22.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.1%).