Creek vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 8,246,359 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 11.0 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 33.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,757, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $36,414, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $46,193, a difference of 0.87%), median family income ($82,560 compared to $83,319, a difference of 0.92%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $41,119, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 57.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 50.8%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (14.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.43%), poverty (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 25.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.2%), currently married (46.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 152.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 62.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 50.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 77.3%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 68.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 51.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.25%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.4%).