Creek vs Panamanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,715,411 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.876. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Panamanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 60.5 Panamanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $96,066, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $82,272, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $90,193, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 11.3%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $58,266, a difference of 12.2%), and median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $52,835, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 32.8%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.13%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.9%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 0.17%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 61.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 37.0%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.16%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Panamanian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 41.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.4%).