Creek vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,842,351 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 10.7 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,546 compared to $52,217, a difference of 46.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $106,629, a difference of 42.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $111,669, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.64%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,984, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $66,118, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 50.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 48.7%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 94.1%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 79.0%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 59.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.5%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.0%).