Creek vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,735,073 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 29.4 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $102,779, a difference of 30.2%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $87,262, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $95,565, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 7.3%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $54,279, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,106, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 45.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 43.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.6%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.4%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 42.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 57.3%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 49.0%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.3%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.0%).