Creek vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,743,484 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.231% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 230.6 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,715 compared to $79,737, a difference of 17.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,275, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $87,751, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $54,474, a difference of 4.9%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $49,215, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $43,026, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 43.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 37.1%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.4%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.8%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.1%), and family households (64.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 0.20%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 79.4%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 27.2%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 65.3%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 60.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.3%).