Creek vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,453,518 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $53,266, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $84,914, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $52,085, a difference of 0.26%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $47,482, a difference of 1.9%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $41,737, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 52.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 45.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.8%), female poverty (17.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and poverty (15.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 27.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 87.5%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (52.2% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 0.30%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 67.7%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.7%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.7%).