Creek vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,532,273 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.208. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 8.9 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and South American communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,715 compared to $86,824, a difference of 28.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $100,837, a difference of 27.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $95,362, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $59,854, a difference of 15.2%), and median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $54,492, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and South American communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 44.7%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.3%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.90%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and South American communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.5%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.0% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.37%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and South American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 35.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and South American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 51.5%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 48.6%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.080%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and South American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 71.0%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.2%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.6%).