Creek vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,104,090 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.204% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 204.5 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $103,954, a difference of 38.9%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $93,933, a difference of 38.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $106,952, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $54,958, a difference of 17.9%), per capita income ($35,546 compared to $42,694, a difference of 20.1%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 59.8%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 54.5%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.68%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 28.8%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.3%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.43%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 114.0%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 79.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 49.8%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.2%).