Creek vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,775,313 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.4%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $42,581, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $79,358, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $51,719, a difference of 0.45%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $68,423, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $33,894, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 21.7%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.81%), single mother poverty (36.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and single female poverty (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 114.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 48.8%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 62.0%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 36.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.96%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (64.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 51.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 44.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.4%), bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.060%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.6%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.7%).