Creek vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,413,596 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 12.3 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $103,472, a difference of 31.0%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $87,557, a difference of 29.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $96,667, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $50,923, a difference of 12.2%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $61,177, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 43.3%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 36.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 24.8%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 65.3%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 65.2%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.9%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.6%).