Creek vs Filipino Community Comparison

COMPARE

Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Creek

Filipinos

Fair
Exceptional
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Filipino Integration in Creek Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,283,083 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 12.0 Filipinos.
Creek Integration in Filipino Communities

Creek vs Filipino Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $128,723, a difference of 72.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $134,910, a difference of 70.9%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $115,509, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $57,740, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $76,686, a difference of 47.6%).
Creek vs Filipino Income
Income MetricCreekFilipino
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,546
Exceptional
$59,066
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,560
Exceptional
$138,397
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,715
Exceptional
$115,509
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,648
Exceptional
$61,197
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,594
Exceptional
$74,224
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,437
Exceptional
$49,508
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,371
Exceptional
$57,740
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,847
Exceptional
$128,723
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$78,960
Exceptional
$134,910
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,949
Exceptional
$76,686
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
29.7%

Creek vs Filipino Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 108.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 93.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 93.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 27.5%).
Creek vs Filipino Poverty
Poverty MetricCreekFilipino
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Single Females
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
24.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Creek vs Filipino Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Creek vs Filipino Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCreekFilipino
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%

Creek vs Filipino Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.9%).
Creek vs Filipino Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCreekFilipino
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Tragic
31.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
71.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
83.5%

Creek vs Filipino Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 49.6%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.060%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Creek vs Filipino Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCreekFilipino
Family Households
Fair
64.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.3%
Exceptional
51.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Currently Married
Poor
46.0%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.6%
Exceptional
23.0%

Creek vs Filipino Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.76%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Creek vs Filipino Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCreekFilipino
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.9%

Creek vs Filipino Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 155.1%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 144.3%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 122.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Creek vs Filipino Education Level
Education Level MetricCreekFilipino
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
89.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
75.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.2%
Exceptional
71.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Exceptional
59.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.9%
Exceptional
52.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
23.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
7.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
3.4%

Creek vs Filipino Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 109.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 90.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.6%).
Creek vs Filipino Disability
Disability MetricCreekFilipino
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
Males
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Females
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
19.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Tragic
4.4%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%