Creek vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,291,130 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 16.4 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,715 compared to $90,261, a difference of 33.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $105,070, a difference of 33.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $98,886, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.0%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $55,659, a difference of 19.5%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $47,628, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 51.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 51.2%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.0%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (64.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.7%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 45.6%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 71.4%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 60.0%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.3%).