Creek vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,677,682 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,546 compared to $50,914, a difference of 43.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $111,454, a difference of 41.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $105,522, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,737, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $64,298, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 55.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 53.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.6%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 29.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (46.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 55.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 88.6%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 81.2%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 77.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 66.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.8%), and male disability (15.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.5%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.9%).