Creek vs Cajun Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,650,887 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 21.5 Cajuns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 24.9%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $52,325, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $82,393, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $45,338, a difference of 0.070%), householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $51,397, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $34,034, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 21.0%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.44%), poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and male poverty (14.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 60.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 9.0%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.79%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.67%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.7%).