Creek vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,543,454 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 17.2 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $100,141, a difference of 26.8%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $85,054, a difference of 25.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $92,876, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.8%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $53,237, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $59,848, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 41.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 38.9%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.1%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.6%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.1%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.29%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 57.4%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 51.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.5%).