Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,144,277 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.715% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 715.2 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 66.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $116,566, a difference of 36.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $67,594, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $56,379, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $44,198, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $53,310, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 79.6%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 56.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 51.3%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 34.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 45.5%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 35.5%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (62.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 244.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 147.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 122.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 42.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 96.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 122.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 77.0%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 47.2%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.8%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.6%).