Immigrants from Dominica vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,645,926 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Dominica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.394% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominica corresponds to a decrease of 393.7 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,311 compared to $116,566, a difference of 39.9%), median family income ($85,411 compared to $118,291, a difference of 38.5%), and median household income ($72,760 compared to $99,933, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,301 compared to $56,379, a difference of 12.1%), median female earnings ($37,825 compared to $44,198, a difference of 16.9%), and median earnings ($42,420 compared to $53,310, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 85.9%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 60.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (22.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 18.2%), single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.0%), male unemployment (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 55.9%), births to unmarried women (39.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 47.4%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 104.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 61.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 14.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (41.6% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 35.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 47.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.4%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 55.0%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 33.6%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.2%).