Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,472,667 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.507. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.955% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to a decrease of 954.9 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $49,741, a difference of 11.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $56,379, a difference of 5.1%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($100,699 compared to $99,933, a difference of 0.77%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,010 compared to $110,787, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $44,198, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.98%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 8.8%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.46%), currently married (47.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.9%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.77%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%).