Pima vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Asia
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,277
SOCIAL INDEX
80.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
80th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Asia Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,320,717 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 44.4 Immigrants from Asia.
Pima vs Immigrants from Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,741, a difference of 62.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $116,566, a difference of 58.9%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $99,933, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $56,379, a difference of 9.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $44,198, a difference of 25.1%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 27.7%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Asia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $49,741 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $118,291 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $99,933 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $53,310 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $63,240 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $44,198 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $56,379 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $110,787 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $116,566 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $67,594 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 135.6%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 131.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 118.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.20%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 46.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 53.1%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Asia |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 26.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 165.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 133.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 127.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Asia |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Good 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Asia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Good 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 100.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 92.2%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.18%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.27, a difference of 14.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Asia |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 49.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Asia |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Fair 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Fair 89.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Excellent 20.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 99.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 90.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 84.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.41%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Asia |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Average 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 69.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 64.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 52.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 44.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 79.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 73.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.090%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.6%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Asia |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Good 47.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |