Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,159,043 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.879. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.829% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to an increase of 829.0 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,434 compared to $49,741, a difference of 23.0%), median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $63,240, a difference of 22.6%), and median family income ($97,222 compared to $118,291, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $56,379, a difference of 7.5%), median female earnings ($38,833 compared to $44,198, a difference of 13.8%), and wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 40.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 29.8%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.9%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (65.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.0%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.19%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.63%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 58.7%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 51.0%), and no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.9%).