Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,726,766 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.524. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.178% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 177.8 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $49,741, a difference of 26.2%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $63,240, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,722 compared to $110,787, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $67,594, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $56,379, a difference of 6.2%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.94%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.5%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 0.46%), family households (67.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 35.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 65.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 59.9%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.090%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 30.1%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.1%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.2%).