Immigrants from Latin America vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 536,487,911 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.799. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.084% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 84.2 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($86,989 compared to $118,291, a difference of 36.0%), per capita income ($36,823 compared to $49,741, a difference of 35.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $110,787, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $56,379, a difference of 9.7%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $44,198, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 58.4%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 48.8%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.4%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 41.1%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 38.7%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.4%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.64%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 86.1%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 66.9%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.3%).