Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,204,226 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.583. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.365% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 365.4 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $110,787, a difference of 14.0%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $99,933, a difference of 13.1%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $63,240, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $56,379, a difference of 7.5%), and per capita income ($46,213 compared to $49,741, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.6%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 16.4%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.0%), family households (64.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.22%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.3%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.060%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.2%).