Immigrants from Iran vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,905,207 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Iran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.808. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iran within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.093% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iran corresponds to an increase of 1,093.5 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,759 compared to $49,741, a difference of 16.1%), householder income over 65 years ($75,081 compared to $67,594, a difference of 11.1%), and median family income ($130,894 compared to $118,291, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,880 compared to $56,379, a difference of 0.89%), median female earnings ($47,154 compared to $44,198, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,204 compared to $110,787, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.9%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.6%), births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.52%), currently married (48.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.1%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.060%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%).