Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Asia
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,277
SOCIAL INDEX
80.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
80th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Asia Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,236,258 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 40.1 Immigrants from Asia.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $99,933, a difference of 42.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $110,787, a difference of 42.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $116,566, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.74%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $67,594, a difference of 25.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $56,379, a difference of 26.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Asia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $49,741 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $118,291 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $99,933 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $53,310 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $63,240 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $44,198 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $56,379 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $110,787 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $116,566 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $67,594 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 51.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 46.7%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.95%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Asia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 26.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.65%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Asia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Asia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Good 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 35.5%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Asia |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Asia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Fair 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Fair 89.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Excellent 20.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 63.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 61.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Asia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 69.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 64.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 52.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 44.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 69.9%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 8.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Asia |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Good 47.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |