Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,053,720 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.841. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 2.214% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to a decrease of 2,214.2 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $110,787, a difference of 21.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $116,566, a difference of 21.3%), and median household income ($82,560 compared to $99,933, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $56,379, a difference of 7.8%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and per capita income ($43,997 compared to $49,741, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.5%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.31%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 26.6%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.2%), family households (63.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.0%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.3%).