African vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,812,841 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.678. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.108% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to a decrease of 108.2 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $110,787, a difference of 40.3%), median household income ($72,650 compared to $99,933, a difference of 37.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,925 compared to $116,566, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 17.5%), householder income under 25 years ($46,838 compared to $56,379, a difference of 20.4%), and median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $44,198, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 58.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 56.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 48.2%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 45.9%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.46%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and family households (62.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.0%), no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 54.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 50.0%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 43.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.0%).