Israeli vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,817,120 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to an increase of 45.2 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,335 compared to $56,379, a difference of 7.7%), per capita income ($52,596 compared to $49,741, a difference of 5.7%), and median household income ($96,552 compared to $99,933, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($63,228 compared to $63,240, a difference of 0.020%), median family income ($118,577 compared to $118,291, a difference of 0.24%), and median earnings ($52,937 compared to $53,310, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 15.0%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.3%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.3%), professional degree (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.3%).