Central American vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,316,834 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.297. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.055% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 54.5 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $63,240, a difference of 31.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $110,787, a difference of 30.1%), and median family income ($91,087 compared to $118,291, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $56,379, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $67,594, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 44.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 37.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.8%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 66.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 53.6%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.1%).