Slavic vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,705,206 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.241% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to a decrease of 240.9 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,398 compared to $99,933, a difference of 15.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $110,787, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $116,566, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $67,594, a difference of 9.5%), and per capita income ($45,049 compared to $49,741, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.0%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.0%), poverty (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.40%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 18.0%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.16%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (64.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 21.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.83%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.5%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.2%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%).