Australian vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,162,733 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.708% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to a decrease of 708.0 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $56,379, a difference of 4.9%), per capita income ($52,074 compared to $49,741, a difference of 4.7%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($118,440 compared to $118,291, a difference of 0.13%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $63,240, a difference of 0.61%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $67,594, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.5%), male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.4%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.7%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.61%), currently married (47.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.59%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 49.5%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and high school diploma (91.2% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (51.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 0.13%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%).