Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 346,472,781 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.149% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 149.2 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $67,594, a difference of 4.8%), per capita income ($52,044 compared to $49,741, a difference of 4.6%), and median household income ($96,378 compared to $99,933, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $63,240, a difference of 0.14%), median earnings ($53,457 compared to $53,310, a difference of 0.28%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $56,379, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.1%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.25%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.6%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.34%).